0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
146.5888
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
36071011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
42%
Anubis
21%
Inferno
12%
Mirage
8%
Ancient
4%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
18%
11
3
Anubis
50%
22
2
Inferno
38%
8
3
Mirage
58%
26
0
Ancient
42%
31
0
Nuke
0%
1
10
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
60%
5
2
Anubis
29%
7
0
Inferno
50%
4
1
Mirage
50%
4
0
Ancient
46%
13
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of NOM vs Kappa Bar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NOM and Kappa Bar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by NOM. The MVP of this match was m4tthi.
NOM analytics
The team NOM secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 20 kills and meztal contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7953 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NOM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Kappa Bar analytics
The team Kappa Bar managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Kappa Bar were delle contributed 19 kills and tvs contributed 14 kills. 6944 of total damage by Kappa Bar could not prevent NOM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Kappa Bar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments