0 Comments
66
65
21
+1
402
13:6
18
1
0%
Teams advantage Dust II (M2)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.2369
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:47s00:35s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5828
AWP damage (avg/round)
59.521.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:10s00:35s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6628
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.86
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
M4A1 kills on a map
94.306
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
51.216.3
Info
Map Analysis of Ninjas in Pyjamas vs PARIVISION by the Bo3.gg Team
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Dust II Analysis
Ninjas in Pyjamas demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 9 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Dust II were sjuush, who contributed 17 kills, and r1nkle, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7416 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Ninjas in Pyjamas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PARIVISION on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for PARIVISION, as they managed to secure 10 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PARIVISION on Dust II included Jame, who contributed 18 kills, and TRAVIS, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7634 total damage, PARIVISION couldn't prevent Ninjas in Pyjamas from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments