0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
24%
Vertigo
17%
Mirage
14%
Inferno
13%
Overpass
10%
Nuke
3%
Dust II
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
36%
11
10
Vertigo
67%
15
3
Mirage
58%
19
6
Inferno
27%
11
15
Overpass
50%
14
8
Nuke
67%
6
12
Dust II
0%
0
6
Anubis
0%
0
25
Last 5 maps
Ancient
60%
5
10
Vertigo
50%
6
12
Mirage
44%
9
13
Inferno
40%
10
4
Overpass
60%
10
0
Nuke
70%
10
4
Dust II
0%
0
3
Anubis
0%
0
23
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllww
- wwlwl
Info
Match analysis of Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Imperial by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Ninjas in Pyjamas and Imperial, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Ninjas in Pyjamas. The MVP of this match was Brollan.
Ninjas in Pyjamas analytics
The team Ninjas in Pyjamas secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas were Brollan contributed 23 kills and k0nfig contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8543 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Ninjas in Pyjamas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Imperial were VINI contributed 11 kills and boltz contributed 10 kills. 4805 of total damage by Imperial could not prevent Ninjas in Pyjamas from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Imperial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments