0 Comments
104
95
23
+9
385
18:12
24
1
+2%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:42s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7930
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0371
USP damage (avg/round)
14.24.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:42s00:39s
Smoke thrown on a map
2815.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
153.4
Deaths on a map
018
Player score (round)
38201012
Info
Map Analysis of Nigma Galaxy SW vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team
Lyngby Vikings on Inferno Analysis
Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Inferno were Daffu, who contributed 27 kills, and WolfY, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11556 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Nigma Galaxy SW on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nigma Galaxy SW, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Nigma Galaxy SW on Inferno included twist, who contributed 26 kills, and PlesseN, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10730 total damage, Nigma Galaxy SW couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nigma Galaxy SW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments