0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
100%
Ancient
83%
Inferno
59%
Overpass
12%
Dust II
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
8
0
Nuke
100%
1
10
Ancient
83%
6
3
Inferno
92%
13
0
Overpass
88%
8
3
Dust II
100%
4
5
Mirage
0%
1
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllww
- llw
Info
Match analysis of Nigma Galaxy vs NIP Impact by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nigma Galaxy and NIP Impact, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Nigma Galaxy. The MVP of this match was vilga.
Nigma Galaxy analytics
The team Nigma Galaxy secured 51 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nigma Galaxy were vilga contributed 50 kills and Kat contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21367 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nigma Galaxy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NIP Impact analytics
The team NIP Impact managed to secure 0 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NIP Impact were ASTRA contributed 31 kills and jenkon contributed 37 kills. 17098 of total damage by NIP Impact could not prevent Nigma Galaxy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NIP Impact struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments