0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Mirage
18%
Ancient
14%
Inferno
6%
Vertigo
5%
Nuke
5%
Overpass
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
43
2
Mirage
52%
50
6
Ancient
64%
22
13
Inferno
56%
34
3
Vertigo
55%
20
18
Nuke
48%
50
2
Overpass
0%
4
40
Anubis
0%
0
12
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
70%
10
2
Ancient
50%
2
6
Inferno
50%
16
1
Vertigo
50%
2
7
Nuke
53%
15
0
Overpass
0%
5
8
Anubis
0%
0
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of Nexus vs Invictus International by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nexus and Invictus International, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Invictus International. The MVP of this match was meztal.
Invictus International analytics
The team Invictus International secured 0 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Invictus International were meztal contributed 41 kills and m1N1 contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19675 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Invictus International held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 51 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were ragga contributed 34 kills and MoDo contributed 28 kills. 16570 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent Invictus International from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments