0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Galil kills on a map
51.8168
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
45673
Player score (round)
35471010
Player score (round)
36261010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
55%
Ancient
53%
Vertigo
40%
Anubis
30%
Nuke
17%
Mirage
12%
Inferno
11%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
55%
11
0
Ancient
53%
19
2
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Anubis
33%
18
0
Nuke
57%
7
2
Mirage
76%
17
0
Inferno
44%
9
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
3
Ancient
0%
2
6
Vertigo
40%
5
1
Anubis
63%
8
0
Nuke
40%
5
3
Mirage
64%
11
0
Inferno
33%
3
4
Info
Match analysis of TNL vs QUAZAR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TNL and QUAZAR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by QUAZAR. The MVP of this match was Tommy.
QUAZAR analytics
The team QUAZAR secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for QUAZAR were Tommy contributed 20 kills and n4mb3r5 contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8273 overall damage.
On the defensive side, QUAZAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TNL analytics
The team TNL managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TNL were yukitoro contributed 15 kills and onic contributed 12 kills. 7154 of total damage by TNL could not prevent QUAZAR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TNL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments