Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:000s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Player score (round)
37951010
Damage (total/round)
40473
Player score (round)
34731010
Player score (round)
38161010
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Inferno
57%
Nuke
42%
Anubis
33%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
6%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
7
0
Inferno
43%
7
3
Nuke
75%
4
2
Anubis
17%
12
0
Mirage
83%
12
0
Ancient
56%
16
1
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
0
Inferno
100%
3
0
Nuke
33%
3
1
Anubis
50%
2
1
Mirage
100%
2
1
Ancient
50%
2
1
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Info
Match analysis of TNL vs Partizan by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TNL and Partizan, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by TNL. The MVP of this match was Ganginho.
TNL analytics
The team TNL secured 29 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TNL were Ganginho contributed 48 kills and emo-- contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21266 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TNL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Partizan analytics
The team Partizan managed to secure 0 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Partizan were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Partizan could not prevent TNL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Partizan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments