Explore Wide Range of
Esports Markets
0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4548
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.64.2
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.1785
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.16.1
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.1785
M4A1 kills on a map
84.2536
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.416.3
AWP kills on a map
126.243
AWP damage (avg/round)
68.821.6
USP kills on a map
31.5954
Train
46%
Inferno
33%
Ancient
27%
Dust II
10%
Nuke
8%
Mirage
6%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Train
93%
15
9
Inferno
33%
6
28
Ancient
80%
35
4
Dust II
60%
30
2
Nuke
65%
40
0
Mirage
50%
32
4
Anubis
57%
23
15
Last 5 maps
Train
47%
17
3
Inferno
0%
1
29
Ancient
53%
32
8
Dust II
70%
33
4
Nuke
57%
28
4
Mirage
56%
16
9
Anubis
58%
26
5
In the CS2 match between TNL and Insilio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by TNL. The MVP of this match was cairne.
TNL analytics
The team TNL secured 28 out of 60 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TNL were cairne contributed 57 kills and Flierax contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22054 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TNL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio managed to secure 32 out of 60 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Insilio were mag1k3Y contributed 50 kills and Dwushka contributed 42 kills. 22579 of total damage by Insilio could not prevent TNL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Insilio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments