Nemiga Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

8

3

+8

120

2:3

5

0

8.2

+43%

14

8

4

+6

95

3:3

3

1

7.8

+17%

13

7

8

+6

97

1:1

3

0

7.6

+33%

13

7

3

+6

73

0:0

3

0

7.0

+21%

11

7

5

+4

77

1:1

2

0

6.7

+17%

Total

67

37

23

+30

462

7:8

16

1

7.4

+26%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

12

3

-2

84

2:2

2

1

6.4

-2%

10

13

0

-3

49

1:0

1

0

5.2

-20%

7

15

4

-8

66

3:2

1

0

5.0

-21%

4

13

2

-9

74

1:2

0

0

4.3

-34%

5

14

3

-9

52

1:1

1

0

4.2

-36%

Total

36

67

12

-31

324

8:7

5

1

5.0

-23%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Nemiga on Anubis Analysis

Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Nemiga on Anubis were Xant3r, who contributed 16 kills, and FL4MUS, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6934 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included Cjoffo, who contributed 10 kills, and simke, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4866 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date