0 Comments
68
93
19
-25
312
12:12
13
2
Inferno5.6
-12%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
46%
Overpass
40%
Ancient
20%
Inferno
13%
Nuke
8%
Mirage
7%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
10
2
Vertigo
33%
3
5
Overpass
40%
5
7
Ancient
0%
0
14
Inferno
67%
15
0
Nuke
25%
12
3
Mirage
50%
12
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
30
Vertigo
79%
14
5
Overpass
80%
5
14
Ancient
20%
5
9
Inferno
80%
20
1
Nuke
17%
6
16
Mirage
43%
7
24
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lwllw
Info
Match analysis of Nemiga vs fnatic Rising by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nemiga and fnatic Rising, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by fnatic Rising. The MVP of this match was Banjo.
fnatic Rising analytics
The team fnatic Rising secured 0 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic Rising were Banjo contributed 19 kills and Peppzor contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9846 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic Rising held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga managed to secure 24 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nemiga were BELCHONOKK contributed 19 kills and fostar contributed 14 kills. 7494 of total damage by Nemiga could not prevent fnatic Rising from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments