0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
136.5888
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
Trades on a map
93.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Player score (round)
36441011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Mirage
38%
Inferno
32%
Vertigo
16%
Anubis
13%
Nuke
3%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
5
Mirage
88%
8
22
Inferno
85%
13
9
Vertigo
78%
18
4
Anubis
57%
23
3
Nuke
58%
12
10
Ancient
66%
38
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
16
7
Inferno
53%
15
4
Vertigo
62%
13
1
Anubis
44%
18
6
Nuke
55%
11
8
Ancient
64%
11
10
Info
Match analysis of Nemiga vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nemiga and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Nemiga. The MVP of this match was riskyb0b.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nemiga were riskyb0b contributed 19 kills and khaN contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7552 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCRED were 1NVISIBLE contributed 19 kills and Sh4GGi contributed 13 kills. 7642 of total damage by ARCRED could not prevent Nemiga from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCRED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments