Ended
1
Full stats

16 Comments

Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

6

2

+4

124

1:1

2

0

7.6

+42%

7

4

2

+3

98

1:1

2

0

6.5

+18%

6

4

2

+2

75

2:0

2

0

6.4

+7%

6

6

1

0

60

1:1

2

0

5.4

-5%

4

5

3

-1

64

1:1

1

0

5.1

-13%

Total

33

25

10

+8

420

6:4

9

0

6.2

+10%

AMKAL Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

7

7

1

0

79

2:0

2

0

7.0

+2%

5

4

4

+1

56

0:2

2

1

5.7

-3%

4

7

3

-3

59

2:2

2

0

5.7

-25%

5

8

3

-3

54

0:0

1

0

5.4

-21%

4

7

1

-3

48

0:2

0

0

4.6

-27%

Total

25

33

12

-8

296

4:6

7

1

5.7

-15%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team

AMKAL on Inferno Analysis

AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 4 out of 10 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AMKAL on Inferno were TRAVIS, who contributed 7 kills, and topo, who added 5 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 2956 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nemiga, as they managed to secure 6 out of 10 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno included riskyb0b, who contributed 10 kills, and Xant3r, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4200 total damage, Nemiga couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments16
By date