0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M2)
Records Ancient
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:21s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:30s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.62
Smoke thrown on a map
2215.0371
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.32
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.43.8
Damage (total/round)
38773
Player score (round)
36521012
Shots (total/round)
9216
Info
Map Analysis of NAVI Javelins vs Flames Shieldmaidens by the Bo3.gg Team
NAVI Javelins on Ancient Analysis
NAVI Javelins demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for NAVI Javelins on Ancient were vicu, who contributed 28 kills, and Hanka, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9865 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, NAVI Javelins held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Flames Shieldmaidens on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Flames Shieldmaidens, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Flames Shieldmaidens on Ancient included aim, who contributed 17 kills, and ramziiN, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7625 total damage, Flames Shieldmaidens couldn't prevent NAVI Javelins from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Flames Shieldmaidens struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments