0 Comments
96
63
24
+33
388
16:10
23
0
+12%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0371
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
14.14.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.92
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.23.8
Smoke thrown on a map
2515.0371
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
37451012
Shots (total/round)
8616
Damage (total/round)
42973
Info
Map Analysis of Natus Vincere vs Ninjas in Pyjamas by the Bo3.gg Team
Natus Vincere on Inferno Analysis
Natus Vincere demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Natus Vincere on Inferno were npl, who contributed 22 kills, and s1mple, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10095 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Natus Vincere held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Ninjas in Pyjamas, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno included REZ, who contributed 14 kills, and headtr1ck, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7450 total damage, Ninjas in Pyjamas couldn't prevent Natus Vincere from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Ninjas in Pyjamas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments