0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
75%
Vertigo
75%
Anubis
67%
Ancient
60%
Overpass
40%
Mirage
33%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
75%
4
0
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Anubis
100%
4
0
Ancient
0%
1
3
Overpass
40%
5
2
Mirage
0%
1
5
Nuke
50%
4
4
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
6
Vertigo
0%
2
4
Anubis
33%
3
0
Ancient
60%
5
0
Overpass
0%
0
6
Mirage
33%
3
3
Nuke
50%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- wlwll
Info
Map Analysis of Nakama vs Lazer Cats by the Bo3.gg Team
Nakama on Anubis Analysis
Nakama demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nakama on Anubis were Kursy, who contributed 34 kills, and Razzmo, who added 28 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 12097 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Nakama held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lazer Cats on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Lazer Cats, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lazer Cats on Anubis included munch, who contributed 30 kills, and Hkta, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10466 total damage, Lazer Cats couldn't prevent Nakama from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments