Nakama Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

21

1

-3

76

1:2

5

1

6.1

+7%

13

19

4

-6

68

2:3

1

0

5.4

-15%

11

21

3

-10

55

1:0

3

1

5.2

+10%

14

21

2

-7

62

0:4

4

0

5.0

-27%

11

22

4

-11

68

3:8

2

0

4.7

-19%

Total

67

104

14

-37

330

7:17

15

2

5.3

-9%

Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

26

11

8

+15

124

5:2

9

1

8.7

+40%

26

13

3

+13

85

1:1

8

1

7.4

+39%

19

15

2

+4

83

6:1

2

0

6.9

+7%

17

12

10

+5

71

4:2

5

0

6.5

+26%

16

16

6

0

79

1:1

5

0

6.2

-1%

Total

104

67

29

+37

442

17:7

29

2

7.1

+22%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Nakama vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were mhL, who contributed 26 kills, and Surreal, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10618 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Nakama on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nakama, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Nakama on Inferno included Razzmo, who contributed 18 kills, and Kyojin, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7911 total damage, Nakama couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nakama struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date