0 Comments
47
65
11
-18
330
6:11
10
0
-10%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
62%
Dust II
25%
Inferno
17%
Mirage
13%
Vertigo
7%
Anubis
5%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
38%
8
13
Dust II
0%
1
3
Inferno
0%
0
41
Mirage
53%
15
14
Vertigo
40%
5
35
Anubis
33%
15
3
Ancient
42%
24
9
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
24
Dust II
25%
4
5
Inferno
17%
6
11
Mirage
40%
10
5
Vertigo
33%
9
3
Anubis
38%
8
19
Ancient
41%
17
5
Last results
Past matches
- lllll
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Mythic vs FLUFFY AIMERS by the Bo3.gg Team
FLUFFY AIMERS on Anubis Analysis
FLUFFY AIMERS demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FLUFFY AIMERS on Anubis were brett, who contributed 17 kills, and sacrifice, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6704 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, FLUFFY AIMERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Mythic on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Mythic, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Mythic on Anubis included Austin, who contributed 12 kills, and fl0m, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5613 total damage, Mythic couldn't prevent FLUFFY AIMERS from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Mythic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments