0 Comments
94
69
23
+25
389
11:13
24
3
+13%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
AK47 kills on a map
166.732
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3055
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:26s00:39s
Shots (total/round)
8316
Multikill x-
4
Info
Map Analysis of Movistar Riders vs ex-Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
ex-Copenhagen Flames on Anubis Analysis
ex-Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ex-Copenhagen Flames on Anubis were b0RUP, who contributed 25 kills, and Farlig, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9734 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, ex-Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Movistar Riders on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Movistar Riders, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Movistar Riders on Anubis included alex, who contributed 16 kills, and dav1g, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7980 total damage, Movistar Riders couldn't prevent ex-Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Movistar Riders struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments