0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.8
5.3
Vertigo1.5
Win Rounds
16
5
Vertigo11
Kills
83
61
Vertigo22
Damage
8.73K
6.92K
Vertigo1813
Economy
459.8K
397.6K
Vertigo62200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
88%
Ancient
71%
Mirage
67%
Inferno
47%
Dust II
33%
Nuke
G
11%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
88%
8
15
Ancient
71%
7
15
Mirage
67%
18
2
Inferno
47%
15
12
Dust II
33%
6
24
Nuke
56%
16
3
Overpass
0%
0
41
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- ww
Info
Match analysis of MOUZ NXT vs GearGaming by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MOUZ NXT and GearGaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by MOUZ NXT. The MVP of this match was TOBIZ.
MOUZ NXT analytics
The team MOUZ NXT secured 21 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ NXT were TOBIZ contributed 17 kills and Jimpphat contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8728 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ NXT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GearGaming analytics
The team GearGaming managed to secure 0 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GearGaming were eightz999 contributed 14 kills and HUckLer contributed 14 kills. 6915 of total damage by GearGaming could not prevent MOUZ NXT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GearGaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments