Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:26s
AK47 kills on a map
96.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.925.3
Galil kills on a map
41.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
25.25.8
Galil kills on a map
31.8171
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.516.3
USP damage (avg/round)
13.34.7
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
20.94
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
51%
Mirage
50%
Dust II
25%
Vertigo
22%
Anubis
21%
Ancient
16%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
51%
35
6
Mirage
0%
0
66
Dust II
100%
3
1
Vertigo
78%
49
4
Anubis
46%
37
30
Ancient
62%
58
3
Inferno
50%
28
7
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
3
Mirage
50%
18
0
Dust II
75%
8
0
Vertigo
56%
9
3
Anubis
25%
8
6
Ancient
46%
13
2
Inferno
50%
14
1
Info
Match analysis of MOUZ NXT vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MOUZ NXT and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by MOUZ NXT. The MVP of this match was PR.
MOUZ NXT analytics
The team MOUZ NXT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ NXT were PR contributed 35 kills and Chr1zN contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14518 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ NXT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 34 kills and sFade8 contributed 23 kills. 12947 of total damage by DMS could not prevent MOUZ NXT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments