Ended
MOUZ
2 - 1
fnatic
Full stats

0 Comments

MOUZ Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

17

5

+2

86

3:2

5

1

7.0

+13%

14

15

3

-1

85

3:3

4

0

6.2

-6%

16

18

0

-2

73

2:3

6

0

5.9

-11%

11

19

4

-8

51

2:0

3

0

5.0

-32%

13

20

7

-7

53

2:5

2

0

4.8

-19%

Total

73

89

19

-16

348

12:13

20

1

5.8

-11%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

17

3

+6

96

5:3

5

0

7.2

+13%

21

14

6

+7

94

1:0

6

0

7.0

+20%

20

13

2

+7

86

2:1

5

1

7.0

+17%

11

15

3

-4

51

2:2

1

0

5.2

-22%

13

16

2

-3

54

3:6

3

0

5.0

-18%

Total

88

75

16

+13

382

13:12

20

1

6.3

+2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MOUZ vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were FASHR, who contributed 23 kills, and mezii, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9540 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MOUZ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MOUZ, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MOUZ on Inferno included JDC, who contributed 19 kills, and frozen, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8704 total damage, MOUZ couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MOUZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date