Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
34881012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36241012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
38373
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
40%
Dust II
38%
Train
29%
Nuke
5%
Vertigo
3%
Mirage
3%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
31
Dust II
38%
13
6
Train
60%
10
3
Nuke
52%
23
1
Vertigo
67%
6
10
Mirage
50%
6
9
Inferno
65%
20
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
40%
10
16
Dust II
0%
0
46
Train
89%
9
10
Nuke
47%
30
5
Vertigo
70%
10
7
Mirage
53%
19
5
Inferno
66%
35
1
Info
Match analysis of MOUZ vs FURIA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MOUZ and FURIA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by MOUZ. The MVP of this match was ropz.
MOUZ analytics
The team MOUZ secured 32 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ were ropz contributed 46 kills and karrigan contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20931 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FURIA analytics
The team FURIA managed to secure 21 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FURIA were yuurih contributed 41 kills and KSCERATO contributed 29 kills. 17865 of total damage by FURIA could not prevent MOUZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FURIA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments