MOUZ Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

16

3

+11

85

4:3

6

2

7.5

+16%

23

16

1

+7

68

4:0

7

0

6.7

+6%

21

21

7

0

84

0:3

4

0

6.2

+13%

15

20

7

-5

66

5:2

3

0

5.6

-14%

14

19

8

-5

68

3:5

4

0

5.4

-17%

Total

100

92

26

+8

372

16:13

24

2

6.3

+1%

EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

20

4

+3

76

5:6

5

0

6.5

+11%

20

15

2

+5

63

1:3

5

3

6.2

+1%

20

24

5

-4

71

3:3

4

1

6.0

-8%

15

20

7

-5

77

4:3

2

0

5.7

-6%

14

21

9

-7

70

0:1

3

0

5.5

-11%

Total

92

100

27

-8

357

13:16

19

4

6.0

-3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MOUZ vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team

MOUZ on Inferno Analysis

MOUZ demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MOUZ on Inferno were torzsi, who contributed 27 kills, and Bymas, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10795 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included amster, who contributed 23 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10342 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent MOUZ from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date