Monte Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

15

3

+6

91

4:3

5

0

7.7

+13%

15

8

4

+7

78

3:0

3

1

7.3

+24%

16

8

5

+8

88

0:1

3

1

7.2

+24%

12

14

4

-2

71

3:2

2

0

6.1

-16%

10

14

5

-4

62

1:3

1

0

5.3

-16%

Total

74

59

21

+15

390

11:9

14

2

6.7

+6%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

16

4

+4

137

2:0

5

0

7.9

+40%

14

14

0

0

69

2:1

4

0

5.8

-6%

11

16

1

-5

57

3:4

1

0

4.9

-11%

8

14

2

-6

55

2:3

2

0

4.8

-22%

4

15

0

-11

30

0:3

1

0

3.4

-46%

Total

57

75

7

-18

347

9:11

13

0

5.4

-9%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Monte vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Monte on Anubis Analysis

Monte demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Monte on Anubis were BOROS, who contributed 21 kills, and DemQQ, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7791 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Monte held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included Cjoffo, who contributed 20 kills, and brutmonster, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6943 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Monte from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date