Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
HE damage (avg/round)
15.83.4
HE damage (avg/round)
15.83.4
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6942
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
58.116.7
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
11.63.4
AWP kills on a map
186.5807
AWP damage (avg/round)
82.221.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.13.8
USP kills on a map
31.6158
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
65%
Overpass
42%
Anubis
12%
Nuke
10%
Vertigo
2%
Mirage
1%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
78
Overpass
44%
16
38
Anubis
80%
35
1
Nuke
52%
23
22
Vertigo
59%
29
26
Mirage
59%
39
1
Ancient
72%
29
5
Last 5 maps
Inferno
65%
23
10
Overpass
86%
7
33
Anubis
68%
19
2
Nuke
62%
13
6
Vertigo
61%
18
2
Mirage
60%
5
34
Ancient
71%
17
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Monte vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Monte and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Monte. The MVP of this match was Woro2k.
Monte analytics
The team Monte secured 32 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Monte were Woro2k contributed 40 kills and sdy contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18116 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Monte held their ground firmly, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 9 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 24 kills and brnz4n contributed 30 kills. 13130 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Monte from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments