0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
50%
Dust II
16%
Mirage
13%
Inferno
6%
Overpass
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
3
Nuke
100%
3
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Mirage
67%
6
0
Inferno
50%
2
4
Overpass
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
8
1
Nuke
50%
8
4
Dust II
83%
18
0
Mirage
54%
13
1
Inferno
56%
16
2
Overpass
0%
3
8
Ancient
0%
0
14
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- lwwll
Info
Map Analysis of Monte vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
Iron Branch on Inferno Analysis
Iron Branch demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Inferno were MaSvAl, who contributed 24 kills, and SENSEi, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9782 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Monte on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Monte, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Monte on Inferno included DemQQ, who contributed 18 kills, and joel, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7116 total damage, Monte couldn't prevent Iron Branch from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Monte struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments