0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
146.4203
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
75%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
29%
Nuke
10%
Ancient
8%
Dust II
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Inferno
100%
3
3
Anubis
67%
3
4
Nuke
67%
6
0
Ancient
50%
12
0
Dust II
0%
1
6
Mirage
50%
4
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
20
Inferno
67%
9
3
Anubis
38%
16
4
Nuke
57%
7
9
Ancient
42%
12
3
Dust II
0%
4
3
Mirage
50%
14
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Molotov vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Molotov and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was CeRq.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were CeRq contributed 19 kills and SHiPZ contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7524 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Molotov analytics
The team Molotov managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Molotov were Stesso contributed 11 kills and Speedie-- contributed 11 kills. 6533 of total damage by Molotov could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Molotov struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments