0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Vertigo
88%
Ancient
85%
Overpass
83%
Dust II
71%
Inferno
24%
Anubis
20%
Nuke
18%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
22
Vertigo
88%
17
1
Ancient
85%
13
5
Overpass
83%
12
2
Dust II
71%
7
0
Inferno
74%
19
8
Anubis
20%
5
3
Nuke
68%
22
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of Molegan vs Lynn Vision by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Molegan and Lynn Vision, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, and victory was secured by Lynn Vision. The MVP of this match was EXPRO.
Lynn Vision analytics
The team Lynn Vision secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lynn Vision were EXPRO contributed 46 kills and z4kr contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23538 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lynn Vision held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Molegan analytics
The team Molegan managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Molegan were Electro contributed 44 kills and xnkka contributed 34 kills. 20740 of total damage by Molegan could not prevent Lynn Vision from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Molegan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments