0 Comments
48
68
20
-20
311
8:10
10
2
-16%
Teams advantage Ancient (M3)
Records Ancient
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:24s
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3011
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
20.73.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:10s00:36s
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.3232
USP kills on a map
31.5986
USP damage (avg/round)
15.74.8
Deagle kills on a map
51.6427
Deagle damage (avg/round)
17.95.3
Info
Map Analysis of Mission Possible vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Ancient Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Ancient were ZeRRoFIX, who contributed 25 kills, and jackasmo, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7357 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Mission Possible on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Mission Possible, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Mission Possible on Ancient included birdfromsky, who contributed 11 kills, and Vegi, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5607 total damage, Mission Possible couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Mission Possible struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments