0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:24s
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
42.311.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.92
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.3232
USP damage (avg/round)
13.84.8
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.3232
Eco wins full buy
1
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
8823.6
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:23s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Nuke
52%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
42%
Anubis
30%
Ancient
17%
Inferno
14%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
8
1
Nuke
77%
13
7
Vertigo
0%
0
29
Mirage
42%
12
2
Anubis
50%
4
16
Ancient
75%
8
11
Inferno
44%
9
20
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
9
Nuke
25%
8
12
Vertigo
50%
6
6
Mirage
0%
0
22
Anubis
20%
5
10
Ancient
58%
12
0
Inferno
30%
10
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Mindfreak vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Mindfreak and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Mindfreak. The MVP of this match was pain.
Mindfreak analytics
The team Mindfreak secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Mindfreak were pain contributed 17 kills and gump contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7588 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Mindfreak held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KZG analytics
The team KZG managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KZG were dpr contributed 16 kills and Hassie contributed 9 kills. 5596 of total damage by KZG could not prevent Mindfreak from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments