0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39151011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
53%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
38%
Overpass
35%
Mirage
19%
Ancient
17%
Anubis
12%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
20
Inferno
0%
2
12
Nuke
25%
4
10
Overpass
60%
5
6
Mirage
50%
8
3
Ancient
44%
9
8
Anubis
55%
11
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
53%
15
8
Inferno
50%
16
13
Nuke
63%
16
8
Overpass
25%
8
39
Mirage
69%
26
6
Ancient
61%
23
19
Anubis
67%
3
42
Info
Match analysis of MIGHT vs Nouns by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIGHT and Nouns, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Nouns. The MVP of this match was Junior.
Nouns analytics
The team Nouns secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nouns were Junior contributed 17 kills and nosraC contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7221 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nouns held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIGHT analytics
The team MIGHT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIGHT were danss contributed 13 kills and scar contributed 10 kills. 5504 of total damage by MIGHT could not prevent Nouns from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIGHT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments