0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
AK47 kills on a map
126.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.725.3
Damage (total/round)
38573
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
HE damage (total/round)
10726.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
76%
Anubis
74%
Inferno
72%
Ancient
71%
Overpass
69%
Nuke
58%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
76%
33
3
Anubis
74%
23
7
Inferno
72%
32
22
Ancient
71%
24
9
Overpass
69%
16
31
Nuke
58%
24
11
Mirage
0%
0
69
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Anubis
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
1
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Xmplfy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Xmplfy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was Tuurtle.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were Tuurtle contributed 21 kills and exit contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8993 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Xmplfy analytics
The team Xmplfy managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Xmplfy were Hoozh contributed 16 kills and Girthquake contributed 9 kills. 5125 of total damage by Xmplfy could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Xmplfy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments