0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.62
AK47 kills on a map
166.5888
Assists on a map
13.924.4098
Shots (total/round)
9216
Shots (total/round)
9116
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39191011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
62%
Overpass
44%
Ancient
42%
Vertigo
27%
Mirage
20%
Anubis
2%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
62%
13
10
Overpass
0%
0
39
Ancient
80%
20
5
Vertigo
56%
16
9
Mirage
70%
10
13
Anubis
53%
15
14
Inferno
67%
9
13
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
54
Overpass
44%
9
21
Ancient
38%
29
15
Vertigo
29%
14
5
Mirage
50%
22
8
Anubis
55%
20
6
Inferno
67%
18
16
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Solid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was exit.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 20 kills and insani contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9529 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were xureba contributed 21 kills and gbb contributed 22 kills. 8508 of total damage by Solid could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments