0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.83.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
AK47 kills on a map
136.732
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
15026.8
HE damage (total/round)
14126.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Plant at last second
02:15s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
80%
Dust II
75%
Inferno
67%
Vertigo
67%
Nuke
64%
Ancient
44%
Overpass
20%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
20%
5
24
Dust II
75%
8
6
Inferno
33%
12
13
Vertigo
67%
3
11
Nuke
36%
14
6
Ancient
44%
9
1
Overpass
20%
5
6
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
1
Dust II
0%
2
0
Inferno
100%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Nuke
100%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwww
- ww
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sao Caetano by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sao Caetano, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was chelo.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 22 kills and JOTA contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9879 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sao Caetano analytics
The team Sao Caetano managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sao Caetano were delboNi contributed 12 kills and danoco contributed 14 kills. 6146 of total damage by Sao Caetano could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sao Caetano struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments