0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:19s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6929
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
8629
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.82
Player score (round)
37841011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35611011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
81%
Mirage
17%
Inferno
15%
Nuke
15%
Vertigo
14%
Anubis
6%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
81%
27
3
Mirage
67%
15
28
Inferno
73%
15
21
Nuke
70%
20
21
Vertigo
64%
28
9
Anubis
67%
21
17
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
43
Mirage
50%
6
11
Inferno
58%
12
11
Nuke
55%
11
12
Vertigo
50%
18
12
Anubis
61%
23
6
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Rooster, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 26 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 41 kills and brnz4n contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16113 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 14 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were nettik contributed 24 kills and TjP contributed 22 kills. 11971 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments