0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
Player score (round)
34751012
Shots (total/round)
11316
Player score (round)
35191012
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
10023.8
HE damage (total/round)
13126.8
HE damage (total/round)
12726.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
67%
Mirage
42%
Overpass
31%
Vertigo
22%
Inferno
15%
Nuke
3%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
67%
21
2
Mirage
75%
8
34
Overpass
86%
7
38
Vertigo
58%
19
2
Inferno
68%
25
12
Nuke
60%
15
6
Ancient
72%
18
14
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
2
21
Mirage
33%
6
22
Overpass
55%
11
2
Vertigo
80%
5
8
Inferno
53%
17
1
Nuke
57%
7
8
Ancient
70%
23
1
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Preasy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was exit.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 45 kills and insani contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20504 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Preasy were refrezh contributed 40 kills and nicoodoz contributed 38 kills. 18567 of total damage by Preasy could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments