MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

6

3

+16

106

2:0

6

0

8.0

+48%

17

5

3

+12

70

3:0

4

0

6.9

+29%

18

11

4

+7

93

5:2

5

0

6.9

+18%

13

7

7

+6

79

4:3

2

0

6.5

+6%

15

4

1

+11

66

0:0

2

0

6.4

+21%

Total

85

33

18

+52

413

14:5

19

0

6.9

+24%

paiN Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

8

18

3

-10

56

1:3

1

0

4.7

-36%

7

16

1

-9

47

2:1

1

0

4.5

-33%

8

17

1

-9

50

1:2

1

0

4.5

-38%

7

17

0

-10

36

1:6

1

1

4.1

-39%

3

17

2

-14

32

0:2

1

0

3.5

-55%

Total

33

85

7

-52

221

5:14

5

1

4.3

-40%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 15 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were Tuurtle, who contributed 22 kills, and WOOD7, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8673 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


paiN on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 6 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for paiN on Nuke included biguzera, who contributed 8 kills, and NEKIZ, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4651 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date