Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:20s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:27s
AWP kills on a map
166.5449
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.8354
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.53.9
M4A1 kills on a map
114.5517
Player score (round)
41371011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
54%
Ancient
46%
Vertigo
31%
Nuke
11%
Anubis
6%
Inferno
4%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
45
Ancient
79%
19
13
Vertigo
33%
18
7
Nuke
54%
13
9
Anubis
50%
22
8
Inferno
60%
10
15
Mirage
70%
23
4
Last 5 maps
Overpass
54%
13
33
Ancient
33%
3
54
Vertigo
64%
22
6
Nuke
65%
23
8
Anubis
56%
36
3
Inferno
64%
11
31
Mirage
69%
26
4
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was lux.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were brnz4n contributed 21 kills and saffee contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9176 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
paiN analytics
The team paiN managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for paiN were lux contributed 27 kills and nqz contributed 15 kills. 8614 of total damage by paiN could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments