Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3055
USP damage (avg/round)
13.34.6
Shots (total/round)
10416
Player score (round)
35041012
Shots (total/round)
10316
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
45%
Dust II
17%
Ancient
17%
Mirage
10%
Overpass
8%
Nuke
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
4
6
Inferno
38%
8
9
Dust II
83%
6
7
Ancient
50%
6
2
Mirage
43%
7
14
Overpass
33%
6
2
Nuke
30%
10
8
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
23
Inferno
83%
12
1
Dust II
100%
5
1
Ancient
67%
6
10
Mirage
53%
15
0
Overpass
25%
4
10
Nuke
33%
6
14
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and OG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by OG. The MVP of this match was nexa.
OG analytics
The team OG secured 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for OG were nexa contributed 22 kills and flameZ contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10370 overall damage.
On the defensive side, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were Tuurtle contributed 16 kills and WOOD7 contributed 14 kills. 8346 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent OG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments