0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
17.73.4
USP damage (avg/round)
14.84.7
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
22.54.7
Kills on a map
27.0317.1703
Damage (avg/round)
136.21897.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
8516
Damage (total/round)
39073
Player score (round)
48031011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Inferno
47%
Ancient
34%
Overpass
27%
Vertigo
20%
Anubis
19%
Mirage
5%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
67%
21
19
Inferno
64%
11
22
Ancient
81%
27
5
Overpass
0%
0
59
Vertigo
70%
23
9
Anubis
62%
21
15
Mirage
72%
18
22
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
28
Inferno
17%
6
6
Ancient
47%
15
6
Overpass
27%
11
10
Vertigo
50%
8
10
Anubis
43%
7
12
Mirage
67%
12
2
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and OG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was saffee.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 27 kills and insani contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7192 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OG analytics
The team OG managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OG were MoDo contributed 15 kills and HeavyGod contributed 13 kills. 5821 of total damage by OG could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments