Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4398
Damage (total/round)
38273
Player score (round)
46831012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
HE damage (total/round)
9126.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
88%
Ancient
67%
Inferno
43%
Overpass
23%
Mirage
12%
Vertigo
10%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
17
Ancient
0%
4
0
Inferno
17%
6
10
Overpass
44%
9
5
Mirage
33%
9
2
Vertigo
33%
9
3
Dust II
33%
6
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
88%
8
2
Ancient
67%
3
0
Inferno
60%
10
6
Overpass
67%
6
16
Mirage
45%
11
10
Vertigo
43%
7
3
Dust II
33%
6
9
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs MOUZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and MOUZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by MOUZ. The MVP of this match was ropz.
MOUZ analytics
The team MOUZ secured 35 out of 55 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ were ropz contributed 50 kills and Bymas contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21121 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 20 out of 55 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 35 kills and boltz contributed 30 kills. 17706 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent MOUZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments