Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
14.83.4
M4A1 kills on a map
134.6963
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0371
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.43.8
Shots (total/round)
12416
Shots (total/round)
8716
Player score (round)
40911012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
69%
Nuke
30%
Dust II
25%
Inferno
16%
Ancient
12%
Overpass
8%
Vertigo
8%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
48
Nuke
70%
20
8
Dust II
65%
23
2
Inferno
56%
18
22
Ancient
45%
11
10
Overpass
64%
14
13
Vertigo
67%
12
14
Last 5 maps
Mirage
69%
16
9
Nuke
100%
1
36
Dust II
40%
10
17
Inferno
40%
15
12
Ancient
57%
14
14
Overpass
56%
9
9
Vertigo
59%
17
8
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Liquid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Liquid. The MVP of this match was JOTA.
Liquid analytics
The team Liquid secured 32 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Liquid were EliGE contributed 41 kills and NAF contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19979 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Liquid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 21 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were JOTA contributed 45 kills and bit contributed 36 kills. 19114 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Liquid from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments