Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.62
AK47 damage (avg/round)
57.425.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.63.8
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0371
AK47 damage (avg/round)
73.625.3
Smoke thrown on a map
1715.0371
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
39373
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
57%
Overpass
50%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
29%
Mirage
27%
Nuke
25%
Dust II
9%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
10%
10
14
Overpass
50%
10
8
Vertigo
33%
12
3
Ancient
29%
7
1
Mirage
36%
14
2
Nuke
0%
1
25
Dust II
29%
7
5
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
3
1
Overpass
0%
2
2
Vertigo
0%
0
10
Ancient
0%
2
0
Mirage
63%
8
1
Nuke
25%
8
2
Dust II
20%
5
5
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Keyd by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Keyd, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was chelo.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 16 kills and exit contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8441 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Keyd analytics
The team Keyd managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Keyd were abr contributed 14 kills and raafa contributed 11 kills. 6011 of total damage by Keyd could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Keyd struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments