0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:24s
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
AWP kills on a map
126.3324
AWP damage (avg/round)
60.821.6
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5028
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.3232
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.125.2
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.14.2
Galil kills on a map
61.8168
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
7%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
4%
Inferno
1%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
36
2
Nuke
61%
28
24
Dust II
67%
3
32
Ancient
66%
29
10
Mirage
39%
23
33
Inferno
64%
14
26
Anubis
62%
42
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
37
Nuke
48%
25
7
Dust II
60%
15
18
Ancient
60%
30
8
Mirage
35%
17
18
Inferno
65%
26
6
Anubis
61%
18
10
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs inSanitY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and inSanitY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was Lucaozy.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were Lucaozy contributed 19 kills and saffee contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7741 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
inSanitY analytics
The team inSanitY managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for inSanitY were cass1n contributed 13 kills and shz contributed 13 kills. 5359 of total damage by inSanitY could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, inSanitY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments