MIBR Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

7

3

+13

115

2:0

5

0

8.8

+43%

20

9

5

+11

121

3:2

6

0

8.5

+46%

16

6

3

+10

73

1:0

4

1

7.4

+27%

13

7

4

+6

81

3:2

4

0

7.0

+16%

13

5

2

+8

70

3:2

3

0

6.9

+30%

Total

82

34

17

+48

460

12:6

22

1

7.7

+32%

HAVU Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

16

1

-7

61

3:0

3

0

5.1

-26%

11

16

0

-5

66

1:2

3

0

4.9

-11%

8

17

4

-9

75

1:3

1

0

4.7

-28%

4

17

1

-13

23

1:3

0

0

3.1

-57%

2

16

1

-14

26

0:4

0

0

2.6

-55%

Total

34

82

7

-48

251

6:12

7

0

4.1

-35%

Teams advantage Mirage (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Mirage Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Mirage were insani, who contributed 20 kills, and brnz4n, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8283 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Mirage included ottoNd, who contributed 9 kills, and uli, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4509 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date