Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.22
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.52
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
67%
Ancient
51%
Overpass
33%
Vertigo
33%
Anubis
20%
Nuke
15%
Inferno
14%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
12
26
Ancient
71%
17
14
Overpass
83%
6
40
Vertigo
44%
16
3
Anubis
70%
20
0
Nuke
60%
15
9
Inferno
60%
20
11
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
10
Ancient
20%
10
4
Overpass
50%
4
8
Vertigo
77%
13
0
Anubis
50%
8
1
Nuke
75%
12
0
Inferno
46%
13
0
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs FTW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and FTW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was saffee.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 44 kills and insani contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19896 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FTW analytics
The team FTW managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FTW were NOPEEJ contributed 26 kills and pr contributed 25 kills. 14815 of total damage by FTW could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments