0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2815.0371
Player score (round)
40371012
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
8826.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
AK47 kills on a map
176.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
64.325.3
HE damage (avg/round)
11.73.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:19s00:39s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
47%
Vertigo
19%
Nuke
15%
Dust II
13%
Inferno
10%
Mirage
4%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
53%
15
21
Vertigo
52%
21
17
Nuke
64%
25
7
Dust II
58%
26
3
Inferno
53%
19
21
Mirage
40%
5
45
Ancient
58%
12
15
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
27
Vertigo
71%
7
2
Nuke
79%
14
4
Dust II
71%
17
3
Inferno
63%
8
17
Mirage
44%
9
5
Ancient
56%
9
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Fluxo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by Fluxo. The MVP of this match was HEN1.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo were Lucaozy contributed 60 kills and felps contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25898 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were HEN1 contributed 58 kills and exit contributed 55 kills. 26311 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Fluxo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments