0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
15.64.7
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.12
Player score (round)
35401011
Player score (round)
39341011
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
58021011
Damage (total/round)
40473
Player score (round)
38961011
Player score (round)
36091011
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
53%
Overpass
29%
Mirage
25%
Ancient
20%
Inferno
19%
Nuke
14%
Vertigo
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
53%
15
15
Overpass
0%
0
41
Mirage
70%
10
14
Ancient
81%
21
5
Inferno
64%
11
13
Nuke
57%
14
11
Vertigo
56%
16
9
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
4
41
Overpass
29%
7
17
Mirage
45%
20
4
Ancient
61%
18
4
Inferno
45%
11
28
Nuke
71%
21
4
Vertigo
54%
13
28
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Fluxo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Fluxo. The MVP of this match was saffee.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo were chay contributed 29 kills and vsm contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10886 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 34 kills and insani contributed 19 kills. 10535 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Fluxo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments