MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

15

5

+11

103

8:1

7

0

8.0

+22%

24

10

6

+14

97

3:1

9

1

7.7

+28%

16

14

2

+2

66

3:2

5

0

5.8

-2%

14

18

5

-4

69

1:2

3

0

5.3

-18%

13

17

2

-4

53

1:5

4

0

4.7

-20%

Total

93

74

20

+19

388

16:11

28

1

6.3

+2%

Evil Geniuses Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

4

+4

98

3:1

5

0

7.1

+18%

18

20

4

-2

67

5:3

5

0

6.0

-2%

12

18

4

-6

61

1:3

3

1

5.2

-19%

12

20

4

-8

44

0:3

4

1

4.7

-32%

8

17

5

-9

42

2:6

3

0

4.2

-27%

Total

73

94

21

-21

313

11:16

20

2

5.4

-12%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Evil Geniuses by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Anubis Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis were insani, who contributed 26 kills, and HEN1, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10478 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Evil Geniuses on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Evil Geniuses, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Evil Geniuses on Anubis included Brehze, who contributed 23 kills, and neaLaN, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8443 total damage, Evil Geniuses couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Evil Geniuses struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date